Why Medicare keeps shrinking the knee replacement fee

The surgeon's national Medicare payment for a primary total knee (CPT 27447) has fallen every year since 2020 except one. A proposal for 2027 would take another fifth of it. Here is the mechanism behind it.

2020
$1,413
2026
$1,160
2027 proposed
$922
Surgeon's workPractice expenseMalpractice

National average, non-APM surgeon, before geographic adjustment. Covers the operation plus all routine care for 90 days afterward. 2020 split between components is approximate. Sources 1, 2, 3.

First, the number

The "15% cut" that is circulating understates it. In the proposed 2027 Physician Fee Schedule (released July 14, 2026), CMS would cut the work value of 27447 by 16.6%, and also cut its practice expense and malpractice values and the conversion factor. Stacked together, the national payment falls about 20%, from $1,160 to $922.

Physician work RVUs alone
−16.6%

19.11 to 15.94. This is probably where "15%" comes from.

Total national payment
−20.5%

$1,159.64 to about $922. Comes on top of a 7.8% cut that already took effect in 2026.

Component of 2744720262027 proposedChange
Work RVUs19.1115.94−16.6%
Practice expense RVUs11.618.92−23%
Malpractice RVUs4.033.22−20%
Conversion factor (non-APM)$33.40$32.84−1.7%
National payment$1,160$922−20.5%

Surgeons in qualifying alternative payment models see $1,165 to $931. This is a proposal: the final rule is expected around November 1, 2026, and could change. Sources 3, 4.

The long slide, and who did not slide

Since 2020 the surgeon's fee has dropped in dollars, not just in buying power. Over the same years, Medicare's facility payment for the very same knee in a hospital outpatient department or surgery center went up. Both lines below start at 100 in 2020.

Same procedure, opposite directions

National Medicare payment for CPT 27447, indexed to 2020 = 100. 2027 values are proposed; facility 2027 values apply the proposed 2.4% update.

Measured against inflation the gap is wider still. A peer-reviewed analysis of CMS fee data found the inflation-adjusted surgeon fee for primary TKA fell 57% from 2000 to 2024, before either the 2026 or 2027 cuts. Sources 2, 5, 6.

Surgeon fee for CPT 27447, dollars

National payment in nominal dollars, and what the 2020 fee would be worth had it tracked consumer prices (CPI-U; 2025 to 2027 estimated at about 2.8% a year).

Why this keeps happening

No single villain. Several rules interact, and every one of them points the same way for a high-volume surgical code.

The fee schedule is a fixed pie

$20 million

By statute, any revaluation that would move total spending by more than $20 million must be offset elsewhere. Raising one service means cutting another. In 2027 the pie is about $91 billion, and its biggest surgical slices are where the money comes from. CMS Administrator Mehmet Oz put the logic plainly in November 2025:

"we took money from specialties and gave it to primary care."

Surgeons get no inflation raise. Buildings do.

$36.69 in 1998, $32.84 in 2027

Hospital and surgery center rates rise each year with a statutory market-basket update (proposed +2.4% to +2.7% for 2027). The physician conversion factor is indexed to nothing. It is lower in nominal dollars than it was in 1998, and Congress has only patched it one year at a time. The AMA estimates physician pay fell 33% in real terms from 2001 to 2025.

Surgeons made the operation more efficient, and that became the evidence

100% to 29% inpatient

TKA came off the inpatient-only list in 2018 and onto the surgery center list in 2020. Within four years the Medicare inpatient share of primary joints fell from essentially all of them to 29%. But the code's 90-day global package was still priced with hospital visits built in. CMS flagged that as a "site-of-service anomaly." The RUC itself agreed to strip two inpatient visits, half a discharge visit and ten minutes of surgical time.

CMS went past the doctors' own recommendation

16.70 vs 15.94

The AMA's RUC recommended cutting work RVUs from 19.11 to 16.70. CMS said that was not enough: time fell more than value did, and it rejected the claim that intensity rose. It instead crosswalked TKA to a code with similar surgical time, CPT 67108 (retinal detachment repair with vitrectomy). The same crosswalk takes THA even lower, to 15.37.

The overhead formula is being rebuilt

−23% practice expense

In 2026 CMS halved the indirect overhead it credits to facility-based procedures, on the theory that hospital-employed surgeons don't carry office costs. For 2027 it proposes retiring the index that tied overhead to old specialty surveys. Malpractice RVUs are tied to work RVUs, so they fall too. Independent groups feel this most, because their rent and staff don't shrink.

An across-the-board "efficiency" haircut

−2.5% in 2026

Starting in 2026, CMS cut work RVUs for nearly every non-time-based service by 2.5%, assuming procedures get faster over time. That moved 27447 from 19.60 to 19.11. Time-based services like office visits and behavioral health were exempt, which shifts value away from procedures automatically.

Anyone can nominate the code, and they keep doing it

2018, 2021, 2026

Anthem nominated TKA as misvalued in 2018, leading to the 2021 cut from 20.72 to 19.60. In 2026 the Maryland Health Care Commission nominated it again, citing the same 2016 Urban Institute timing study. CMS also cites NSQIP operating-room data flagging 97 musculoskeletal codes whose assumed times look too long. Expect TKA and others to be revisited.

The money is going somewhere on purpose

Ortho −7%, social workers +12%

CMS's own impact table shows orthopedic surgery down 7% overall (8% in facilities, the worst of any specialty), while clinical social workers gain 12%, psychologists 11% and geriatrics 4%. A new office-visit add-on would pay primary care inside an ACO 32% more per visit. The policy goal is longitudinal and primary care, funded from procedures.

Sources 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12.

The work value, step by step

Each drop in 27447's work RVUs traces to a specific event. The 2027 proposal would be the largest single step.

CPT 27447 work RVUs

Step changes in the physician work value. 2027 is proposed.

The case each side makes

Both arguments have real evidence behind them. What follows is each side's strongest version.

CMS and supporters of the cut

  • The work did change. Shorter stays mean fewer hospital visits inside the 90-day global, and CMS says payment should follow the work actually done.
  • Claims show only 67% of 90-day global surgeries record even one post-op visit, suggesting packages are padded.
  • RUC values come from surveys of the surgeons who are paid by them. MedPAC has long said CMS over-relies on societies with a financial stake.
  • Primary care and behavioral health have been underpaid for decades, and the law requires the money to come from somewhere.
  • Per minute of surgery, CMS says it is preserving TKA's current intensity, not penalizing it.

Surgeons and their societies

  • Time left the hospital, not the surgeon. Pre-op optimization, outpatient follow-up and phone triage moved to the practice, and the RUC surveys don't capture it.
  • CMS's value is below even the reduced RUC recommendation, and the 2016 timing study it relies on was never meant to set fees, per its authors.
  • Facilities get inflation updates for the same case. Surgeons are now roughly 6% of the outpatient Medicare payment for a knee.
  • Cuts push independent groups toward hospital employment, which raises commercial prices and narrows access for an aging population.
  • Orthopedics proved value-based care works (bundles, outpatient migration) and is being repriced for its own efficiency.

Sources 3, 4, 8, 13, 14.

What it means for one surgeon

Set an annual Medicare volume to see the national-average difference between 2026 and the 2027 proposal. Real numbers vary with geography, payer mix and APM status.

Uses non-APM national rates: TKA $1,159.64 to $922, THA $1,161 to $925.

2026 professional fees$0
2027 proposed$0
Difference$0

Surgeons paid on work RVUs by an employer can see this flow into total pay, since many contracts apply one dollar-per-RVU rate to every payer.

What happens next

Sources 4, 8, 15, 16.

Zoom out: Following the CMS dollarWhere CMS's $1.7 trillion goes, and why the physician fee schedule gets squeezed while other lines grow.

Sources

  1. AAHKS / Epstein Becker Green, Status of 2025 Medicare TJA Rates (2020 to 2025 national PFS, OPPS and ASC rates).
  2. AAHKS, Summary of the 2026 Medicare PFS Final Rule.
  3. AAHKS, Summary of the Proposed 2027 PFS, Phase I (July 22, 2026).
  4. CMS, CY 2027 PFS Proposed Rule, CMS-1848-P; fact sheet.
  5. AAHKS, Summary of the 2026 OPPS and ASC Final Rules.
  6. Palmer et al., Medicare Reimbursement for Primary and Revision THA and TKA, 2000 to 2024, J Arthroplasty 2025.
  7. Peán, What Orthopedic Surgeons Should Know About the CY 2027 PFS Proposed Rule, Techy Surgeon.
  8. Peán, The $523 Knee: Who Wins and Who Loses, Techy Surgeon.
  9. AAOE, Policy Brief on the CY 2026 PFS Final Rule (efficiency adjustment).
  10. AAOS, 2021 MPFS Final Rule Summary (20.72 to 19.60).
  11. AAHKS and AAOS, Letter on the Anthem misvalued-code nomination (2019).
  12. Haas et al., The Shift to Same-Day Outpatient Joint Arthroplasty, J Arthroplasty 2022.
  13. AAOS, urges CMS to withdraw the proposals (Healio, Sept 2026).
  14. Becker's Spine Review, OrthoForum on the proposed 20% cut.
  15. Becker's ASC, CJR-X proposal.
  16. McDermott+, PFS phase-in of significant RVU reductions.